The human Sclerostin ELISA kit is an overnight, 96-well sandwich ELISA for the quantitative determination of human Sclerostin in serum, plasma, urine and cell culture supernatant. The Sclerostin ELISA employs human serum-based standards to ensure the measurement of biologically reliable data.
The Sclerostin ELISA assay uses highly purified, epitope mapped antibodies.
Sclerostin ELISA Assay Principle
The Sclerostin ELISA kit is a sandwich enzyme immunoassay for the quantitative determination of Sclerostin (SOST) in human serum, plasma, urine and cell culture supernatnat samples.
The figure below explains the principle of the Sclerostin sandwich ELISA:
In a first step, assay buffer is pipetted into the wells of the microtiter strips. Thereafter, standard/control/sample and detection antibody (biotinylated monoclonal mouse anti-human Sclerostin) are pipetted into the wells, which are pre-coated with polyclonal goat anti-human Sclerostin antibody. Any Sclerostin present in the standard/control/sample binds to the pre-coated antibody in the well and forms a sandwich with the detection antibody. In a washing step, all non-specific unbound material is removed. In a next step, the conjugate (strepdavidin-HRP) is pipetted into the wells and reacts with the detection antibody. After another washing step, the substrate (tetramethylbenzidine, TMB) is pipetted into the wells. The enzyme-catalyzed color reaction of the substrate is directly proportional to the amount of Sclerostin present in the sample. This color change is detectable with a standard microtiter plate reader. A dose response curve of the absorbance (optical density, OD, at 450 nm) versus standard concentration is generated, using the values obtained from the standards. The concentration of human Sclerostin in the sample is determined directly from the dose response curve.
Sclerostin ELISA Typical Standard Curve
The figure below shows a typical standard curve for the human Sclerostin ELISA. The immunoassay is calibrated against human recombinant Sclerostin peptide:
Sclerostin ELISA Kit Components
Contents
Description
Quantity
PLATE
Polyclonal goat anti-human Sclerostin antibody pre-coated microtiter strips in a strip holder, packed in an aluminum bag with desiccant
12 x 8 tests
WASHBUF
Wash buffer concentrate 20 x, natural cap
1 x 50 ml
STD
Standards 1-6, (0; 15; 30; 60; 120; 240 pmol/l), recombinant human Sclerostin in human serum, white caps, lyophilized
6 vials
CTRL
Control, yellow cap, lyophilized, exact concentration on the label
1 vial
ASYBUF
Assay buffer, red cap, ready to use
1 x 20 ml
AB
Monoclonal mouse anti-human Sclerostin antibody, biotinylated, green dye, green cap, ready to use
1 x 7 ml
CONJ
Conjugate (streptavidin-HRP), amber bottle, amber cap, ready to use
1 x 22 ml
SUB
Substrate (TMB solution), amber bottle, blue cap, ready to use
1 x 22 ml
STOP
Stop solution, white cap, ready to use
1 x 7 ml
Storage instructions: all reagents of the Sclerostin ELISA kit are stable at 4°C (2-8°C) until the expiry date stated on the label of each reagent.
Serum, EDTA plasma, heparın plasma, citrate plasma, cell culture supernatant and urine are suitable for use in this Biomedica Sclerostin assay. Do not change sample type during studies. We recommend duplicate measurements for all samples, standards and controls. The sample collection and storage conditions listed are intended as general guidelines.
Serum & Plasma
Collect venous blood samples in standardized serum separator tubes (SST) or standardized blood collection tubes using EDTA, heparın or citrate as an anticoagulant. For serum samples, allow samples to clot for 30 minutes at room temperature. Perform separation by centrifugation according to the tube manufacturer’s instructions for use. Assay the acquired samples immediately or aliquot and store at -25°C or lower. Lipemic or haemolyzed samples may give erroneous results. Samples can undergo at least four freeze-thaw cycles.
Cell Culture Supernatant
Note: the experiments performed to measure Sclerostin in cell culture supernatant samples did not undergo a full validation according to FDA/ICH/EMEA guidelines. However, our performance check suggests that cell culture supernatant samples can be measured with this ELISA.
Remove particulates by centrifugation and assay immediately or aliquot and store samples at -25°C or lower.
Urine
Note: the experiments performed to measure bioactive Sclerostin in urine samples did not undergo a full validation according to FDA/ICH/EMEA guidelines. However, our performance check suggests that urine samples can be measured with this ELISA. For more information please see our validation data file.
Aseptically collect the first urine of the day (mid-stream), voided directly into a sterile container. Centrifuge to remove particulate matter, assay immediately or aliquot and store at -25°C or lower.
Reagent Preparation
Wash Buffer
1.
Bring the WASHBUF concentrate to room temperature. Crystals in the buffer concentrate will dissolve at room temperature.
2.
Dilute the WASHBUF concentrate 1:20, e.g. 50 ml WASHBUF + 950 ml distilled or deionized water. Only use diluted WASHBUF when performing the assay.
The diluted WASHBUF is stable up to one month at 4°C (2-8°C).
Standards
1.
Pipette 400 µl of distilled or deionized water into each standard (STD) and control (CTRL) vial. The exact concentration is printed on the label of each vial.
2.
Leave at room temperature (18-26°C) for 15 min. Vortex gently.
Reconstituted STDs and the CTRL are stable at -25°C or lower until expiry date stated on the label. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Sample Preparation
Bring samples to room temperature and mix samples gently to ensure the samples are homogeneous. We recommend duplicate measurements for all samples.
Samples for which the OD value exceeds the highest point of the standard range can be diluted with ASYBUF (assay buffer).
Sclerostin ELISA Assay Protocol
Read the entire protocol before beginning the assay.
1.
Bring samples and reagents to room temperature (18-26°C).
2.
Mark positions for STD/CTRL/SAMPLE (standard/control/sample) on the protocol sheet.
3.
Take microtiter strips out of the aluminum bag. Store unused strips with desiccant at 4°C in the aluminum bag. Strips are stable until expiry date stated on the label.
4.
Pipette 150 µl ASYBUF (assay buffer, red cap) into each well.
5.
Add 20 µl STD/CTRL/SAMPLE into the respective wells.
6.
Add 50 µl AB (biotinylated anti-Sclerostin antibody, green cap, green dye) into each well. Swirl gently.
7.
Cover tightly and incubate overnight (18-24 h) at room temperature (18-24°C) in the dark. Attention: Incubation higher than room temperature reduces the top OD.
8.
Aspirate and wash wells 5 x with 300 µl diluted WASHBUF (wash buffer). After the final wash, remove the remaining WASHBUF by strongly tapping plate against a paper towel.
9.
Add 200 µl CONJ (conjugate, amber cap) into each well.
10.
Cover tightly and incubate for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark.
11.
Aspirate and wash wells 5 x with 300 µl diluted WASHBUF. After the final wash, remove remaining WASHBUF by strongly tapping plate against a paper towel.
12.
Add 200 µl SUB (substrate, blue cap) into each well.
13.
Incubate for 30 min at room temperature in the dark.
14.
Add 50 µl STOP (stop solution, white cap) into each well.
15.
Measure absorbance immediately at 450 nm with reference 630 nm, if available.
Calculation of Results
Read the optical density (OD) of all wells on a plate reader using 450 nm wavelength (reference wavelength 630 nm). Construct a standard curve from the absorbance read-outs of the standards using commercially available software capable of generating a four-parameter logistic (4-PL) fit. Alternatively, plot the standards’ concentration on the x-axis against the mean absorbance for each standard on the y-axis and draw a best fit curve through the points on the graph. Curve fitting algorithms other than 4-PL have not been validated and will need to be evaluated by the user.
Obtain sample concentrations from the standard curve. If required, pmol/l can be converted into pg/ml by applying a conversion factor (1 pg/ml = 0.044 pmol/l (MW: 22.5 kD)). Respective dilution factors must be considered when calculating the final concentration of the sample.
The quality control protocol supplied with the kit shows the results of the final release QC for each kit at production date. Data for OD obtained by customers may differ due to various influences including the normal decrease of signal intensity throughout shelf life. However, this does not affect validity of results as long as an OD of 1.00 or higher is obtained for the standard with the highest concentration and the control value is in range (target range see label).
Background & Therapeutic Areas
Sclerostin Protein
Sclerostin is a 22.5 kDa secreted glycoprotein that functions as a potent inhibitor of Wnt signaling. It acts by binding to the Wnt-coreceptor LRP5/6 thus inhibiting bone formation by regulating osteoblast function and promoting osteoblast apoptosis. The Sclerostin protein consists of two flexible N- and C-terminal arms and a cystine-knot with three loops, whereas the second loop binds to the LRP5/6 complex. Sclerostin is classically considered to be a monomeric protein, but data from Hernandez and colleagues (Hernandez et al., 2014) postulate that circulating sclerostin has a dimeric configuration. In addition, it is not yet well documented if also Sclerostin fragments circulate, but the comparison of different Sclerostin ELISAs suggest that fragments exist as well (Dallas et al., 2013).
Molecular weight
22.5 kDa
Cellular localization
Extracellular
Post-translational modifications
Glycosylation
Sequence similarities
Sequence similarity to the DAN (differential screening-selected gene aberrative in neuroblastoma) family of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonists
Sclerostin is nearly exclusively produced in osteocytes (van Bezooijen et al., 2009). Mutations in the Sclerostin (SOST) gene can cause sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease which are bone dysplasia disorders characterized by progressive skeletal overgrowth (Wergedal et al., 2003). Sclerostin levels are altered in response to hormonal stimuli or due to pathophysiological conditions. Sclerostin concentrations are increased in disorders such as hypoparathyroidism (Costa et al., 2011), Paget’s disease (Yavropoulou et al., 2012), multiple myeloma (Terpos et al., 2012) and in cancer induced bone diseases (Yavropoulou et al., 2012). Sclerostin levels are decreased in primary hyperparathyroidism (Lierop et al., 2010), as well as by the mechanical stimulation of bone (Robling et al., 2008). Several studies have found a positive association between sclerostin and bone mineral density (Amrein et al., 2012; Garnero et al., 2013). Sclerostin levels in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are increased up to 4-fold compared to patients without CKD and increase with CKD stage and declining kidney function (Cejka et al., 2012; Pelletier et al., 2013). In CKD patients, renal elimination of sclerostin increases with decreasing renal function (Cejka et al., 2014). In dialysis patients, sclerostin is an independent predictor of bone loss (Malluche et al., 2014). Numerous studies have shown that serum sclerostin levels are also associated with cardiovascular events (Kanbay et al., 2014; Viaene et al., 2013). The FDA authorization of a humanized monoclonal Sclerostin antibody for the treatment of osteoporosis in patients at high risk is currently under investigation (McClung, 2017). For reviews please refer to the following references: Costa et al., 2017; Drake and Khosla, 2017.
Bone Diseases
Osteoporosis
Cancer induced bone disease
Van Buchem disease
Thalassemia-associated osteoporosis
Cardiovascular Diseases
Vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease patients
Serum sclerostin and adverse outcomes in nondialyzed chronic kidney disease patients. Kanbay, M., Siriopol, D., Saglam, M., Kurt, Y.G., Gok, M., Cetinkaya, H., Karaman, M., Unal, H.U., Oguz, Y., Sari, S., Eyileten, T., Goldsmith, D., Vural, A., Veisa, G., Covic, A., Yilmaz, M.I., 2014. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 99, E1854-1861. PMID: 25057883
Sclerostin in mineralized matrices and van Buchem disease. van Bezooijen, R.L., Bronckers, A.L., Gortzak, R.A., Hogendoorn, P.C.W., van der Wee-Pals, L., Balemans, W., Oostenbroek, H.J., Van Hul, W., Hamersma, H., Dikkers, F.G., Hamdy, N. a. T., Papapoulos, S.E., Löwik, C.W.G.M., 2009. J. Dent. Res. 88, 569–574. PMID: 19587164
All Biomedica ELISAs are validated according to international FDA/ICH/EMEA guidelines. For more information about our validation guidelines, please refer to our quality page and published validation guidelines and literature.
Show validation literature
ICH Q2(R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology.
EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009 Guideline on bioanalytical method validation.
Bioanalytical Method Validation, Guidance for Industry, FDA, May 2018
Calibration
The Sclerostin ELISA immunoassay is calibrated against recombinant human Sclerostin protein (Q9BQB4 (Uniprot ID)).
Sclerostin ELISA Detection Limit & Sensitivity
To determine the sensitivity of the Sclerostin ELISA, experiments measuring the lower limit of detection (LOD) and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were conducted.
The LOD, also called the detection limit, is the lowest point at which a signal can be distinguished above the background signal, i.e. the signal that is measured in the absence of Sclerostin, with a confidence level of 99%. It is defined as the mean back calculated concentration of standard 1 (0 pmol/l of Sclerostin, five independent measurements) plus three times the standard deviation of the measurements.
The LLOQ, or sensitivity of an assay, is the lowest concentration at which an analyte can be accurately quantified. The criteria for accurate quantification at the LLOQ are an analyte recovery between 75 and 125% and a coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 25%. To determine the LLOQ, standard 2, i.e. the lowest standard containing Sclerostin, is diluted, measured five times and its concentration is back calculated. The lowest dilution, which meets both criteria, is reported as the LLOQ.
The following values were determined for the Sclerostin ELISA:
LOD
3.2 pmol/l
LLOQ
7.5 pmol/l
Sclerostin ELISA Precision
The precision of an ELISA is defined as its ability to measure the same concentration consistently within the same experiments carried out by one operator (within-run precision or repeatability) and across several experiments using the same samples but conducted by several operators using different ELISA lots (in-between-run precision or reproducibility).
Within-Run Precision
Within-run (intra-assay) precision was assessed by measuring two samples of known concentrations eight times within one Sclerostin ELISA kit lot by one operator.
ID
n
Mean Sclerostin [pmol/l]
SD [pmol/l]
CV (%)
Sample 1
8
33.6
2.37
7
Sample 2
8
118.8
5.36
5
In-Between-Run Precision
In-between-run (inter-assay) precision was assessed by measuring two samples six times within three ELISA kit lots by two different operators.
ID
n
Mean Sclerostin [pmol/l]
SD [pmol/l]
CV (%)
Sample 1
6
30.5
3.19
10
Sample 2
6
120.2
3.67
3
Sclerostin ELISA Accuracy
The accuracy of an ELISA is defined as the precision with which it can recover samples of known concentrations.
The recovery of the Sclerostin ELISA was measured by adding recombinant Sclerostin to human samples containing a known concentration endogenous bioactive Sclerostin. The % recovery of the spiked concentration was calculated as the percentage of measured compared over the expected value.
The table shows the summary of the recovery experiments in the Sclerostin ELISA in human serum samples:
% Recovery
+70 pmol/l
+120 pmol/l
Sample matrix
n
Mean
Range
Mean
Range
Serum
6
97
93-101
90
84-97
Show Individual Measurements
Data showing % recovery of recombinant Sclerostin in human serum samples:
Sclerostin [pmol/l]
% Recovery
Sample matrix
ID
Reference
+ 70 pmol/l
+ 120 pmol/l
+ 70 pmol/l
+ 120 pmol/l
Serum
s1
25.1
73.4
126.7
101
95
Serum
s2
32.8
72.2
133.1
93
97
Serum
s3
29.3
72.4
115.3
96
84
Serum
s4
33.2
76.1
123.4
99
89
Serum
s5
28.5
70.0
119.0
93
87
Serum
s6
31.3
75.1
117.3
99
85
Mean
97
90
Min
93
84
Max
101
97
Sclerostin ELISA Dilution Linearity & Parallelism
Tests of dilution linearity and parallelism ensure that both endogenous and recombinant samples containing Sclerostin behave in a dose dependent manner and are not affected by matrix effects. Dilution linearity assesses the accuracy of measurements in diluted clinical samples spiked with known concentrations of recombinant analyte. By contrast, parallelism refers to dilution linearity in clinical samples and provides evidence that the endogenous analyte behaves in same way as the recombinant one. Dilution linearity and parallelism are assessed for each sample type and are considered acceptable if the results are within ± 20% of the expected concentration.
Dilution Linearity
Dilution linearity was assessed by serially diluting human samples spiked with 100 pmol/l recombinant Sclerostin with assay buffer.
The table below shows the mean recovery and range of serially diluted recombinant Sclerostin in serum:
% Recovery of recombinant Sclerostin in diluted samples
1+1
1+3
Sample matrix
n
Mean
Range
Mean
Range
Serum
3
96
94-100
108
100-113
Show Individual Measurements
Data showing dilution linearity of human serum samples containing recombinant Sclerostin:
Sclerostin [pmol/l]
% Recovery
Sample matrix
ID
Unspiked
Reference
1+1
1+3
1+1
1+3
Serum
s1
10.0
99.5
51.6
22.5
96
111
Serum
s2
10.2
96.1
51.1
24.0
94
100
Serum
s3
7.9
85.8
42.7
19.0
100
113
Mean
96
108
Min
94
100
Max
100
113
Parallelism
Parallelism was assessed by serially diluting serum samples containing endogenous Sclerostin with assay buffer.
The table below shows the mean recovery and range of serially diluted endogenous Sclerostin in human serum:
% Recovery of endogenous Sclerostin in diluted samples
1+1
1+3
1+7
Sample matrix
n
Mean
Range
Mean
Range
Mean
Range
Serum
4
110
96-121
113
99-130
106
72-139
Show Individual Measurements
Data showing dilution linearity of human serum samples containing endogenous Sclerostin:
Sclerostin [pmol/l]
% Recovery
Sample matrix
ID
Reference
1+1
1+3
1+7
1+1
1+3
1+7
Serum
s1
176
106
57
31
121
130
139
Serum
s2
75
36
19
7
96
99
72
Serum
s3
50
27
13
6
108
102
93
Serum
s4
242
142
74
36
117
122
119
Mean
110
113
106
Min
96
99
72
Max
121
130
139
Sclerostin ELISA Specificity
The specificity of an ELISA is defined as its ability to exclusively recognize the analyte of interest.
The specificity of the Sclerostin ELISA was shown by characterizing both the capture and the detection antibodies through epitope mapping.
Epitope Mapping
Linear epitopes of both utilized antibodies were analyzed with a microarray technique of overlapping peptides spotted to a glass slide. Linear epitopes of the polyclonal capture antibody are distributed throughout the whole Sclerostin protein, whereas the monoclonal detection antibody has just one epitope in the core region.
Cross Reactivity
The cross-reactivity of the Sclerostin ELISA was tested on a panel of related molecules. The Sclerostin ELISA does not recognize Noggin and Wise (SOSTDC1).
The assay does not detect rat or mouse Sclerostin.
Sample Stability
The stability of endogenous Sclerostin was tested by comparing Sclerostin measurements in serum samples that had undergone four freeze-thaw cycles. Samples can undergo at least four freeze-thaw cycles.
The mean CV of human serum samples (n=4) containing different levels of endogenous Sclerostin after four freeze-thaw cycles is 3%.
Sample Values
Sclerostin Values in Apparently Healthy Individuals
To provide expected values for circulating Sclerostin, a panel of samples from apparently healthy donors was tested.
A summary of the results is shown below:
Sample matrix
n
Median
5% Percentile
95% Percentile
Serum
411
24.14
10.78
52.02
Citrate plasma
40
33
20
54
It is recommended to establish the normal range for each laboratory.
Sclerostin Values from Donor Sera of an Unselected Hospital Panel
A panel of samples from an unselected hospital panel was tested.
A summary of the results is shown below:
Sample matrix
n
Median
5% Percentile
95% Percentile
Serum
15
57
9
118
Citrate plasma
40
33
20
54
Matrix Comparison
To assess whether all tested matrices behave the same way in the Sclerostin ELISA, concentrations of Sclerostin were measured in serum, EDTA, heparın and citrate plasma samples prepared from eight apparently healthy donors. Each individual donated blood in all tested sample matrices.
A summary table of Sclerostin levels in various sample matrices is shown below:
Sclerostin [pmol/l]
Sample ID
Serum
EDTA plasma
Citrate plasma
Heparın plasma
% CV
#1
26.4
20.0
23.2
25.4
12
#2
22.4
16.3
19.6
19.8
13
#3
26.9
18.8
23.6
22.9
15
#4
17.1
12.1
14.2
14.6
14
#5
28.3
22.7
26.4
26.8
9
#6
28.2
21.9
29.1
31.5
15
#7
27.9
22.0
25.4
26.0
10
#8
18.5
11.6
13.5
16.7
20
Mean
13
Comparison with other Assays
Biomedica’s Sclerostin ELISA (Cat. No. BI-20492*) was compared with the bioactive Sclerostin ELISA (Cat. No. BI-20472**). The same panel of samples was tested (16 EDTA plasma samples and 16 serum samples). The correlation between the two assays was R= 0.58.
*launched 2013, ** launched 2018
The correlation between the two assays resulted in R2=0.58. Sclerostin sample values measured with the Biomedica “bioactive Sclerostin ELISA” (Cat. No. BI-20472) are higher than in the Biomedica “Sclerostin ELISA” (Cat. No. BI-20492). The results demonstrate that the antibodies utilized in both assays bind to different regions of the Sclerostin molecule. The monoclonal capture antibody of the bioactive Sclerostin ELISA binds to the receptor binding site of Sclerostin, a region that is most probably more resistant to cleavage.
Dissecting the mechanisms of bone loss in Gorham-Stout disease. Rossi M., Buonuomo P.S., Battafarano G., Conforti A., Mariani E., Algeri M., Pelle S., D'Agostini M., Macchiaiolo M., De Vito R., Gonfiantini M.V., Jenkner A., Rana I., Bartuli A., Del Fattore A., 2020. Bone 130:115068. PMID: 31525474.
Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis Patients. Petrovic M., Baralic M., Brkovic V., Arsenovic A., Stojanov V., Lalic N., Stanisavljevic D., Jankovic A., Radivojevic N., Pejanovic S., Maric I., Lezaic V., 2020. Medicina; 56(9):435.
Dissecting the mechanisms of bone loss in Gorham-Stout disease. Rossi, M., Buonuomo, P.S., Battafarano, G., Conforti, A., Mariani, E., Algeri, M., Pelle, S., D’Agostini, M., Macchiaiolo, M., De Vito, R., Gonfiantini, M.V., Jenkner, A., Rana, I., Bartuli, A., Del Fattore, A., 2020. Bone 130, 115068.
Sex steroids as determinants of Wnt-Signalling markers in men. Banica, T., Verroken, C., Zmierczak, H.-G., Goemaere, S., Defreyne, J., T, G., Kaufman, J.-M., Lapauw, B., 2019. Presented at the 21st European Congress of Endocrinology, BioScientifica.
Rheumatoid arthritis in remission. Kerschan-Schindl, K., Ebenbichler, G., Föeger-Samwald, U., Leiss, H., Gesslbauer, C., Herceg, M., Stummvoll, G., Marculescu, R., Crevenna, R., Pietschmann, P., 2019a. Wien Klin Wochenschr 131, 1–7.
Fassio, A., Adami, G., Benini, C., Vantaggiato, E., Saag, K.G., Giollo, A., Lippolis, I., Viapiana, O., Idolazzi, L., Orsolini, G., Rossini, M., Gatti, D., 2019. Bone 123, 191–195. PMID:30910600
Thiele, S., Hannemann, A., Winzer, M., Baschant, U., Weidner, H., Nauck, M., Thakker, R., Bornhäuser, M., Hofbauer, L., Rauner, M., 2019. Endocrine Connections.
Bojanić, K., Bilić Ćurčić, I., Kuna, L., Kizivat, T., Smolic, R., Raguž Lučić, N., Kralik, K., Šerić, V., Ivanac, G., Tucak-Zorić, S., Včev, A., Smolić, M., 2018. J Clin Med 7. PMID:30227689; PMCID: PMC6162798
Idolazzi, L., El Ghoch, M., Dalle Grave, R., Bazzani, P.V., Calugi, S., Fassio, S., Caimmi, C., Viapiana, O., Bertoldo, F., Braga, V., Rossini, M., Gatti, D., 2018. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity 23, 255–261.
Mabille, C., Ruyssen-Witrand, A., Degboe, Y., Gennero, I., Loiseau, H.A., Roussel, M., Hebraud, B., Nigon, D., Attal, M., Laroche, M., 2018. Bone 113, 114–117.
Mantovani, A., Sani, E., Fassio, A., Colecchia, A., Viapiana, O., Gatti, D., Idolazzi, L., Rossini, M., Salvagno, G., Lippi, G., Zoppini, G., Byrne, C.D., Bonora, E., Targher, G., 2018. Diabetes Metab. PMID:30315891
Terpos, E., Kastritis, E., Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I., Christoulas, D., Papatheodorou, A., Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, E., Kanellias, N., Fotiou, D., Ziogas, D.C., Migkou, M., Roussou, M., Trougkakos, I.P., Gavriatopoulou, M., Dimopoulos, M.A., 2018. Am. J. Hematol. PMID:30592079
Zheng, J., Maerz, W., Gergei, I., Kleber, M., Drechsler, C., Wanner, C., Brandenburg, V., Reppe, S., Gautvik, K., Medina-Gomez, C., Shevroja, E., Gilly, A., Park, Y.-C., Dedoussis, G., Zeggini, E., Lorentzon, M., Henning, P., Lerne, U., Nilsson, K., Moverare-Skrtic, S., Baird, D., Falk, L., Groom, A., Capellini, T., Grundberg, E., Nethander, M., Ohlsson, C., Smith, G.D., Tobias, J., 2018. bioRxiv 455386.
Catalano, A., Pintaudi, B., Morabito, N., Giunta, L., Loddo, S., Corrado, F., D’Anna, R., Lasco, A., Di Benedetto, A., 2017. Diabetes & Metabolism 43, 375–377.
Göbel, A., Kuhlmann, J.D., Link, T., Wimberger, P., Browne, A.J., Rauner, M., Hofbauer, L.C., Rachner, T.D., 2017. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 164, 737–743.
Muschitz, G.K., Schwabegger, E., Fochtmann, A., Baierl, A., Kocijan, R., Haschka, J., Gruther, W., Schanda, J.E., Resch, H., Rath, T., Pietschmann, P., Muschitz, C., 2017. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 32, 2381–2393.
Perpétuo, I.P., Caetano-Lopes, J., Vieira-Sousa, E., Campanilho-Marques, R., Ponte, C., Canhão, H., Ainola, M., Fonseca, J.E., 2017. Frontiers in Medicine 4.
Fujiwara, M., Kubota, T., Wang, W., Ohata, Y., Miura, K., Kitaoka, T., Okuzaki, D., Namba, N., Michigami, T., Kitabatake, Y., Ozono, K., 2016. Bone 85, 91–98.
Guañabens, N., Mumm, S., Gifre, L., Ruiz-Gaspà, S., Demertzis, J.L., Stolina, M., Novack, D.V., Whyte, M.P., 2016. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 31, 1774–1782.
Guañabens, N., Ruiz-Gaspà, S., Gifre, L., Miquel, R., Peris, P., Monegal, A., Dubrueil, M., Arias, A., Parés, A., 2016. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 31, 1725–1733.
Kashii, M., Matuso, Y., Sugiura, T., Fujimori, T., Nagamoto, Y., Makino, T., Kaito, T., Ebina, K., Iwasaki, M., Yoshikawa, H., 2016. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 34, 315–324.
Morabito, N., Catalano, A., Gaudio, A., Morini, E., Bruno, L.M., Basile, G., Tsiantouli, E., Bellone, F., Agostino, R.M., Piraino, B., La Rosa, M.A., Salpietro, C., Lasco, A., 2016. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 34, 540–546.
Muschitz, C., Kocijan, R., Haschka, J., Zendeli, A., Pirker, T., Geiger, C., Müller, A., Tschinder, B., Kocijan, A., Marterer, C., Nia, A., Muschitz, G.K., Resch, H., Pietschmann, P., 2016. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 31, 672–682.
Polyzos, S.A., Anastasilakis, A.D., Kountouras, J., Makras, P., Papatheodorou, A., Kokkoris, P., Sakellariou, G.T., Terpos, E., 2016. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 34, 447–456.
Wibmer, C., Amrein, K., Fahrleitner-Pammer, A., Gilg, M.M., Berghold, A., Hutterer, G.C., Maurer-Ertl, W., Gerger, A., Leithner, A., Pichler, M., Szkandera, J., 2016. Scientific Reports 6.
Daniele, G., Winnier, D., Mari, A., Bruder, J., Fourcaudot, M., Pengou, Z., Tripathy, D., Jenkinson, C., Folli, F., 2015. Diabetes Care 38, 1509–1517. PMID:26084344
Gatti, D., El Ghoch, M., Viapiana, O., Ruocco, A., Chignola, E., Rossini, M., Giollo, A., Idolazzi, L., Adami, S., Dalle Grave, R., 2015. Bone 78, 212–215
Gifre, L., Vidal, J., Carrasco, J.L., Filella, X., Ruiz-Gaspà, S., Muxi, A., Portell, E., Monegal, A., Guañabens, N., Peris, P., 2015. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 30, 1014–1021.
Kerschan-Schindl, K., Thalmann, M.M., Weiss, E., Tsironi, M., Föger-Samwald, U., Meinhart, J., Skenderi, K., Pietschmann, P., 2015. PLOS ONE 10, e0132478.
Kim, W., Chung, Y., Kim, S.H., Park, S., Bae, J.H., Kim, G., Lee, S.J., Kim, J.E., Park, B.W., Lim, S.K., Rhee, Y., 2015. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 30, 58–64. PMID:25827459; PMCID: PMC4384667
Muschitz, C., Kocijan, R., Pahr, D., Patsch, J.M., Amrein, K., Misof, B.M., Kaider, A., Resch, H., Pietschmann, P., 2015. Calcified Tissue International 96, 477–489.
Negredo, E., Diez-Pérez, A., Bonjoch, A., Domingo, P., Pérez-Álvarez, N., Gutierrez, M., Mateo, G., Puig, J., Echeverría, P., Escrig, R., Clotet, B., 2015. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 70, 2104–2107. PMID:25769303
Skowrońska-Jóźwiak, E., Lewandowski, K.C., Adamczewski, Z., Krawczyk-Rusiecka, K., Lewiński, A., 2015. Int J Endocrinol 2015, 948384. PMID:26366174; PMCID: PMC4561097
Catalano, A., Pintaudi, B., Morabito, N., Di Vieste, G., Giunta, L., Bruno, M.L., Cucinotta, D., Lasco, A., Di Benedetto, A., 2014. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 171, 293–300. PMID:24891138
González-Reimers, E., López-Prieto, J., Pelazas-González, R., Alemán-Valls, M.R., José de la Vega-Prieto, M., Jorge-Ripper, C., Durán-Castellón, M.C., Santolaria-Fernández, F., 2014. J Bone Metab 21, 69–75. PMID:24707469; PMCID: PMC3970296
Kanbay, M., Siriopol, D., Saglam, M., Kurt, Y.G., Gok, M., Cetinkaya, H., Karaman, M., Unal, H.U., Oguz, Y., Sari, S., Eyileten, T., Goldsmith, D., Vural, A., Veisa, G., Covic, A., Yilmaz, M.I., 2014. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 99, E1854-1861. PMID:25057883
Kyvernitakis, I., Rachner, T.D., Urbschat, A., Hars, O., Hofbauer, L.C., Hadji, P., 2014. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 140, 1671–1680.
de Rooy, D.P.C., Yeremenko, N.G., Wilson, A.G., Knevel, R., Lindqvist, E., Saxne, T., Krabben, A., Leijsma, M.K., Daha, N.A., Tsonaka, S., Zhernakova, A., Houwing-Duistermaat, J.J., Huizinga, T.W.J., Toes, R.E.M., Baeten, D.L.P., Brouwer, E., van der Helm-van Mil, A.H.M., 2013. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 72, 769–775.
Gatti, D., Viapiana, O., Fracassi, E., Idolazzi, L., Dartizio, C., Povino, M.R., Adami, S., Rossini, M., 2012. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 27, 2259–2263.
Gaudio, A., Privitera, F., Battaglia, K., Torrisi, V., Sidoti, M.H., Pulvirenti, I., Canzonieri, E., Tringali, G., Fiore, C.E., 2012. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 97, 3744–3750.
Gennari, L., Merlotti, D., Valenti, R., Ceccarelli, E., Ruvio, M., Pietrini, M.G., Capodarca, C., Franci, M.B., Campagna, M.S., Calabrò, A., Cataldo, D., Stolakis, K., Dotta, F., Nuti, R., 2012. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 1737–1744. PMID:22399511
Skowrońska-Jóźwiak, E., Krawczyk-Rusiecka, K., Lewandowski, K.C., Adamczewski, Z., Lewiński, A., 2012. Thyroid Res 5, 14. PMID:23146624; PMCID: PMC3537580
Terpos, E., Christoulas, D., Katodritou, E., Bratengeier, C., Gkotzamanidou, M., Michalis, E., Delimpasi, S., Pouli, A., Meletis, J., Kastritis, E., Zervas, K., Dimopoulos, M.A., 2012. Int J Cancer 131, 1466–1471. PMID:22052418
Voskaridou, E., Christoulas, D., Plata, E., Bratengeier, C., Anastasilakis, A.D., Komninaka, V., Kaliontzi, D., Gkotzamanidou, M., Polyzos, S.A., Dimopoulou, M., Terpos, E., 2012. Horm Metab Res 44, 909–913. PMID:22581647
Frost, M., Andersen, T., Gossiel, F., Hansen, S., Bollerslev, J., van Hul, W., Eastell, R., Kassem, M., Brixen, K., 2011. J Bone Miner Res 26, 1721–1728.
Terpos, E., Christoulas, D., Katodritou, E., Bratengeier, C., Lindner, B., Harmelin, S., Hawa, G., Boutsikas, G., Migkou, M., Gavriatopoulou, M., 2009. Blood 114, 425.